July 19, 2011

Bring it on Back

1 Conference, 8 shows, 3 movies (HP 7.2 twice!), 1 awesome lunch date with Phaidra, 2 iPads, and 1 evening hanging out with family (including hilarious nephews and a brand-new niece) I am back in London and buckling down. Following is a list of people I really want to see the next time I take a "working holiday":

(In no particular order)

Christopher
Karen
Tara
Lauren
Mallorie
Sara
Ricky
Stephanie
The GNO girls
Kacey
Michelle
Phaidra
My parents
Siblings and their spouses
Niece and nephews (and nieces and nephews)
My dentist

I'm thinking Christmas break. (This is not necessarily a complete list - it's just the ones I've been thinking about recently that my sleep-deprived brain can remember.)

Trip stories (and pictures!) to follow - is it weird that the first thing I do when I get back to my computer is blog?

Hello, London.



July 05, 2011

Potent Quotables

"Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn."
Benjamin Franklin


"Nothing great was ever achieved without enthusiasm."
Ralph Waldo Emerson


"Being ignorant is not so much a shame, as being unwilling to learn."
Benjamin Franklin

"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication."
Leonardo DaVinci
                                                                                        "We are all dying of miscellany."    
                                                                                                Ralph Waldo Emerson


* * * * *

Oh, What A Night...

Stephanie: "What I meant to say... I don't remember... I'm kind of like a goldfish."

Charisse: "I like the idea of being a manwhore with standards."
Steph: "It means you'll almost try anything once!"

Mal: "I'm an athletic tutor."
Sara: "Not to be confused with an athletic supporter!"
Charisse: "It's a different level of elastic."

Stephanie: "He got married and they have two kids, and they're ugly. I wish them well. And their ugly little family."

Charisse: "Seriously, it's just so random. They're like... rabbits. Bunnymellows!"
...
Mal: "Hold on - let me chew through my fluffy friends."

Stephanie: "Actually, I'll probably try anything twice - after all, if you try it once and it doesn't work it's not really a fair judgement. So, I'll almost try anything twice!"

Sara: "I don't think what I'm feeling is the Spirit."

Stephanie (holding the open end of a large drinking glass over her mouth): "Rutabaga. Arugula. Various Garden Greens."*

Mal: "Celine Dion's voice gives me a migraine and makes my legs hurt..."

Stephanie: "Rogue olive! Rogue olive!"



EPIC.





*Seriously, try it. Everything is funny when you say it into a glass.

July 03, 2011

Lest We Forget

The Fourth of July and Religion - Editorial

As the nation celebrates its independence this weekend with the customary and appropriate festivities, it is important to pause a bit to ponder how, unlike virtually every nation on Earth, the United States was founded on ideas, not on a particular ethnic identity. Those ideas are succinctly described in the Declaration of Independence as the "self-evident" truths that "all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness..."


That one phrase succinctly defines what matters to Americans. We believe in the rule of law, protected by enumerated unalienable rights that later were specified in the Constitution. We believe government should allow people to thrive through individual initiative by providing them safety and the freedom to find fulfillment as they pursue their own visions of happiness.

And most importantly, we believe that all these things come to humanity as entitlements from a divine creator. They cannot be revoked by any act of a human being. That part of our nation's founding, so essential to the essence of America, seems to be getting pushed aside lately by a host of "isms" that include relativism, secularism, atheism and even commercialism. And yet, without the idea that rights are derived from a higher power, they become merely good ideas, not inherent, inborn traits that are immune to negotiation.


This important truth also is being pushed aside by ignorance. The recent National Assessment of Education Progress test found that American schoolchildren are woefully deficient in knowledge about the nation's history. Only 20 percent of fourth-graders, 17 percent of eighth-graders and 12 percent of high school seniors demonstrated the knowledge and analytical skills to be labeled as proficient, and just 1 percent displayed "superior performance." A basic level, by contrast, denotes only "partial mastery" — and this is where most American students score in history. (Sample questions can be found at www.nationsreportcard.gov.)

Fewer than a third of eighth-graders could identify an advantage American forces held over the British during the Revolutionary War, and only 2 percent of 12th-graders understood the meaning of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court case that ended public school segregation.

Without a knowledge of American history, people put themselves at the mercy of political spin or of trendy ideas about the role of religion in society.

The wording of our founding documents, as well as the record of how the Founders felt, makes it clear that the nation's greatness doesn't derive from the rights the people hold, but from the creator who endowed them with those rights.

That is an important truth to ponder this weekend, as are the potential consequences to the nation if it is not taught to each new generation.

The NBC television network recently edited out the words "under God" from a video montage that included schoolchildren reciting the Pledge of Allegiance before the final round of the U.S. Open Golf Championship. The decision to edit those words seemed to be a nod to those who find any mention of belief or devotion in the public square to be embarrassing or disconcerting.

The Founding Fathers, however, believed such discussion was so important they began the very first amendment of the Bill of Rights by saying, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." and then followed that with protections for free speech. They intended to protect the nation from passing laws favoring one religion over another, but there is no indication they wanted to remove the discussion of, or references to, religion in the public square.